Subject: Re: [AthofSV] The Soul-less Atheists, a new message.

From: Democrat Cat <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 05:21:52 -0700 (PDT)

Religious reasoning can be incredibly inconsistent, can't it?
   
  Many religious folks believe the soul enters the fertilized egg within a short period of time after fertilization. Following that reasoning, by virtue of being here (having been born), even atheists have souls. And if we didn't, wouldn't that defeat the whole purpose of the religious trying to save our souls? 
   
  In Jim Bill's original post, Gary DeMar states that "the consistent rationalist will reject the reality" of the soul. But as Dr. Roadnight points out, DeMar also claims that atheists have no souls!
   
  Since we do have souls by virtue of being born, and DeMar is denying we do, does that make him an atheist? And does he have a soul? Oh my! <wink>

bty83947820 <[email-masked]> wrote:
          And in conclusion, how does Mr Demar know we have no souls? I thought 
when it came to religion that a mans soul was the province of God; and 
only he could judge. 
Dr Dennis Roadnight.

  .

---------------------------------
Be a PS3 game guru.
Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo! Games.